
In the resources sector, capital access is everything. Where a company chooses to list can shape not only its ability to raise funds, but also how it is perceived by investors and peers.
Recently, there has been a noticeable trend of Canadian mining companies seeking out the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), while at the same time, the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) has been actively courting ASX-listed juniors for dual listings. These moves highlight the increasingly competitive dynamic between two of the world’s most important mining bourses — and the opportunities and challenges for companies weighing their options.
A Mining.com report earlier this year captured a striking development: Canadian miners, long accustomed to raising funds at home, are now flocking to the ASX. Why? For many, it comes down to liquidity and investor appetite.
The ASX benefits enormously from Australia’s superannuation system, which channels a steady flow of capital into equities. That deep domestic investor pool gives resource companies — even smaller, more speculative explorers — a chance to attract active trading and favourable valuations. For Canadian companies, the ASX offers exposure to an audience that is already familiar with mining, comfortable with risk, and often enthusiastic about commodities like copper, gold, and lithium.
It’s not just about money. Branding matters too. In recent years, the ASX has positioned itself as a “natural home” for resource companies, particularly those seeking international visibility. For juniors struggling with limited traction on the TSX Venture Exchange, an ASX listing can be a strategic reset: a way to tap a fresh market, generate buzz, and build momentum.
On the flip side, the TSX is hardly standing still. As Stockhead notes, TSX and its junior board, TSX Venture, remain the dominant home for global mining companies, with nearly 40% of the world’s public miners listed in Canada. In Q1 2025 alone, C$4.3 billion was raised on the TSX/TSXV, 75% of which flowed into mining.
But beneath those headline figures lies a challenge: liquidity for smaller issuers is increasingly thin. Many junior explorers find themselves overlooked in a crowded field. To address this, TSX has been actively targeting Australian companies, pitching dual listings as a way to diversify their shareholder base and access Canadian institutional capital.
For ASX juniors with conviction projects, a Canadian dual listing can be an attractive way to broaden exposure. Canada’s deep pool of mining analysts, specialised funds, and retail investors offers credibility and scale that the ASX alone cannot match.
So what sets these two exchanges apart? While both share a deep history in mining, several structural differences influence why companies might favour one over the other — or pursue both through dual listing.
1. Liquidity and Investor Depth
2. Reporting and Compliance
3. Valuation and Capital Raising Environment
4. Market Perception
5. Time Zones and Trading Hours
Dual listings allow companies to straddle time zones, offering nearly 24-hour trading coverage between Australia and North America. This can improve price discovery and broaden the investor base.
For many resource companies, it isn’t a question of ASX or TSX — it’s both. Dual listings allow miners to tap different pools of capital, balance liquidity constraints, and expand their investor profile.
Of course, dual listings aren’t free. Companies must manage compliance with two regulatory regimes, additional reporting requirements, and the practical costs of maintaining two shareholder registers. Currency risk and arbitrage opportunities between markets can also complicate the picture.
Yet for juniors with conviction projects, the benefits often outweigh the drawbacks. As Stockhead put it, “mining juniors can prosper in Canada” if they bring a strong ASX track record. Conversely, Canadian juniors increasingly see the ASX as a springboard to growth.
The competition between ASX and TSX is less a zero-sum battle than a sign of the sector’s globalisation. Both exchanges will continue to play vital roles in the mining investment ecosystem, with each offering distinct advantages.
For Canadian miners, the ASX represents liquidity, branding, and a highly engaged retail base. For Australian juniors, the TSX offers scale, depth, and access to global capital. Companies willing to straddle both worlds may find themselves best placed to thrive in an industry where capital is as crucial as geology.
Closing Thoughts
For resource companies, the choice of exchange is no longer a simple matter of geography. The ASX and TSX each offer compelling strengths — and neither can be ignored by serious players in the global mining industry. Whether through primary listings, secondary listings, or strategic dual listings, miners are increasingly realising that the smartest strategy may be to have a foot firmly planted on both sides of the Pacific.
After all, it’s a friendly rivalry within the Commonwealth family — two resource-rich nations with shared history, similar legal systems, and a healthy dose of competitive spirit. For companies navigating the global capital markets, that connection makes the ASX and TSX less adversaries than complementary gateways to growth
